삼성 960 프로 NVMe M.2 SSD 성능확인 (2TB)

삼성의 신형 960프로 NVMe M.2 SSD 벤치마크

Samsung 960 PRO Specifications Comparison
	960 PRO 2TB	960 PRO 1TB	960 PRO 512GB	950 PRO 512GB	950 PRO 256GB
Form Factor	Single-sided M.2 2280			Single-sided M.2 2280
Controller	Samsung Polaris			Samsung UBX
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x4			PCIe 3.0 x4
NAND	Samsung 48-layer 256Gb MLC V-NAND			Samsung 32-layer 128Gbit MLC V-NAND
Sequential Read	3500 MB/s	3500 MB/s	3500 MB/s	2500MB/s	2200MB/s
Sequential Write	2100 MB/s	2100 MB/s	2100 MB/s	1500MB/s	900MB/s
4kB Random Read (QD1)	14k IOPS			12k IOPS	11k IOPS
4kB Random Write (QD1)	50k IOPS			43k IOPS	43k IOPS
4kB Random Read (QD32)	440k IOPS	440k IOPS	330k IOPS	300k IOPS	270k IOPS
4kB Random Write (QD32)	360k IOPS	360k IOPS	330k IOPS	110k IOPS	85k IOPS
Read Power	5.8W	5.3W	5.1W	5.7W (average)	5.1W (average)
Write Power	5.0W	5.2W	4.7W
Endurance	1200TB	800TB	400TB	400TB	200TB
Warranty	5 Year			5 Year
Launch MSRP	$1299	$629	$329	$350	$200

- 삼성 960프로 스펙

폼팩터 : Single-sided M.2 2280

컨트롤러 : 삼성 폴라리스

낸드 : 삼성 48층 256Gb MLC V-NAND

시퀀셜 읽기/쓰기(공통) : 3500 MB/s - 2100 MB/s

4kB 랜덤 읽기(QD1) : 14k IOPS

4kB 랜덤 쓰기(QD1) : 50k IOPS

4kB 랜덤 읽기(QD32) : 330k~440k IOPS

4kB 랜덤 쓰기(QD32) : 330k~360k IOPS

읽기 전력소모 : 5.1W ~ 5.8W

쓰기 전력소모 : 4.7W ~ 5.0W

워런티 : 5년

- 테스트 시스템

AnandTech 2015 SSD Test System
CPU	Intel Core i7-4770K running at 3.5GHz (Turbo & EIST enabled, C-states disabled)
Motherboard	ASUS Z97 Pro (BIOS 2701)
Chipset	Intel Z97
Memory	Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2x8GB (9-10-9-27 2T)
Graphics	Intel HD Graphics 4600
Desktop Resolution	1920 x 1200
OS	Windows 8.1 x64

For the first time, a drive has completed The Destroyer without any operations taking more than 100ms. Though at a tighter standard of 10ms, the improvement from the 950 Pro is relatively small.

The Samsung 950 Pro was still unmatched in average data rate, even against higher capacity competition. The 2TB 960 Pro pushes the limits a little further.

The 2TB 960 Pro delivers a slightly lower average service time than the 512GB 950 Pro, and the other PCIe SSDs are well behind.

Samsung's PCIe SSDs and the Intel 750 are all very close in terms of the number of high-latency outliers they experience, while the other PCIe SSDs and the best SATA SSDs are 2-4x worse.

Once again, Samsung breaks its own unchallenged record with average data rates on the Light test. The NVMe drives all show a relatively large disparity in performance when the test is run on a full drive compared to starting on an empty drive, while the faster SATA drives have very little room to perform better on an empty drive.

The 960 Pro shows almost no improvement in average service time, but it doesn't need to since its worst-case full drive performance is better than the competition's best case.

Of the PCIe SSDs only the OCZ RD400 experiences more than a handful of operations that take longer than 10ms to complete. The Samsung 850 EVO is itself an odd outlier because the Light test fits entirely within its SLC cache, so no operations take more than 10ms.

The Samsung 960 Pro slightly widens what was already a commanding lead in low queue depth random read performance.

The 960 Pro's random write performance is a big improvement over the 950 Pro, catching up with the OCZ RD400 but still well behind the Intel 750.

The 2TB 960 Pro's low queue depth sequential read speed is about 300MB/s faster than the 950 Pro, once again giving Samsung the clear lead in performance and showing that the 960 Pro is significantly better than the 950 Pro where thermal limits are a factor.

Thermals are an even bigger factor for the sequential write test than for sequential reads. The 960 Pro is 60% faster than the next fastest M.2 SSD and almost catches up to the RD400A with its thermal pad behind the controller allowing it to use its adapter card as a heatsink.

The Samsung 950 Pro never had a clear lead on the mixed random I/O test, and then the OCZ RD400 raised the bar. The 960 Pro is 22% faster than that and is alone at the top.

The 960 Pro's mixed sequential speeds are a big jump over any previous drive, with about a 30% advantage over the OCZ RD400A and over three times the performance of any SATA drive.

The active idle power consumption of the PCIe SSDs is still far higher than is typical for SATA SSDs, and is enough to keep their temperatures relatively high as well. The 960 Pro 2TB draws only slightly more power than the 950 Pro.

출처 - http://www.anandtech.com